Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04179
Original file (BC 2013 04179.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04179
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  His Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 29 Mar 11, 6 Sep 11, 
20 Jun 12, and 16 Oct 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness 
Management System (AFFMS).

2.  His administrative demotion to the rank of Airman First Class 
(A1C) be revoked and his rank of Senior Airman (SrA) be 
reinstated. 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a documented medical condition that precluded him from 
achieving a passing score on all of his failed FAs.

He was administratively demoted from the rank of SrA to A1C due to 
his failure to maintain fitness standards.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 28 Jun 12, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent 
to recommend that he be demoted to the rank of A1C under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion/Demotion Programs.  
The specific reason for this action was his failure to maintain 
fitness standards in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Fitness 
Program.  The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification 
of demotion action.

On 10 Jul 12, the applicant submitted written matters in his own 
behalf.  On 14 Aug 12, the 90 Security Forces Group Commander 
(SFG/CC) reviewed the case file and after consulting with the 
Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) he directed the applicant be demoted to 
the rank of A1C.

On 14 Aug 12, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the demotion 
order and his right to appeal.  On the same date, he elected not 
to appeal the demotion decision.  The applicant was demoted to the 
rank of A1C with a DOR and effective date of 14 Aug 12.

In a letter dated 25 Oct 12, the applicant’s medical provider 
determined that he had a documented medical condition that 
precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt 
portion of the FAs conducted on 29 Mar 11, 6 Sep 11, 20 Jun 12, 
and 16 Oct 12.

In a letter dated 17 Jul 14, the applicant’s commander stated that 
the applicant’s Primary Care Manager (PCM) conducted a medical 
condition determination for the applicant’s failed FAs and 
concluded the applicant had a documented medical condition that 
precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt 
portion of the FA tests.  Based on the guidance and recommendation 
from the PCM, the commander requests all FA failures between 
29 Mar 11 and 16 Oct 12, be invalidated due to the applicant’s 
medical records history.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of his request to have his FA dated 
20 Jun 12, removed from AFFMS indicating the applicant has not 
provided sufficient evidence to support his claim.  

Although the applicant provided an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting 
Condition Report, for his 13 Jul 12 and 19 Nov 12 FAs, he did not 
provide an AF Form 469 to exempt him from the sit-up component of 
the 20 Jun 12 FA.  Nor did he provide an invalidation memorandum 
from his unit commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate 
the FA.

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove 
the demotion action and restore his rank to SrA.  The commander 
acted within his authority to demote the applicant for his failure 
to maintain fitness standards.

IAW AFI 36-2502, Fitness Program, paragraph 6.3.5, airmen may be 
demoted for failing to maintain or demonstrate the ability and 
willingness to attain physical standards.  The commander reviewed 
the statements submitted by the applicant and chose to continue 
the demotion action.  The demotion authority agreed with the 
commander’s recommendation and directed the applicant be demoted 
to the rank of A1C.

The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D.


?
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit E).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate 
the existence of an error or injustice to warrant removing the 
contested FAs.  After a thorough review of the evidence of record 
and the applicant’s complete submission we believe relief is 
warranted.  In this respect, we note the Air Force offices of 
primary responsibility recommend denial.  However, we find the 
letter from his commander dated 17 Jul 14 , stating the applicant 
had a documented medical condition that precluded him from 
achieving a passing score on the FA test sufficient to recommend 
removing the contested FAs.  Regarding the applicant’s request to 
revoke his administrative demotion to the rank of A1C and to 
reinstate his rank of SrA, given the demotion was based on the 
contested FA, the underlying basis for the demotion no longer 
exists.  Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s records be 
corrected as indicated below.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that:

	a.  His Fitness Assessments, dated 29 Mar 11, 6 Sep 11, 
20 Jun 12, and 16 Oct 12, be declared void and removed from the 
Air Force Fitness Management System.

	b.  His 14 Aug 12, administrative demotion be set aside and 
that all associated rights and privileges be restored.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2013-04179 in Executive Session on 18 Sep 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                     , Panel Chair
                     , Member
                     , Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

		Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Sep 13, w/atchs.
		Exhibit B.  Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records
		Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 27 May 14, w/atch.
		Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 13 Jun 14.
		Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jul 14.



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01519

    Original file (BC 2014 01519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be provided the E-5 back-pay from the date of his 15 May 13 demotion date. The narrative reason for his retirement was “Temporary Early Retirement Authority.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial due to lack of supporting evidence (i.e. medical validation, commander's invalidation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04345

    Original file (BC 2013 04345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the demotion action and restore his rank to Technical Sergeant. Therefore, in view of the fact that we have determined the evidence is sufficient to conclude there was a causal nexus between the medical condition for which the applicant received a disability discharged and his ability to attain passing scores on his FAs, we also believe it is reasonable to conclude...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03455

    Original file (BC 2013 03455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Apr 12, the applicant received notification of demotion action under AFI 36-2502, Failure to Keep Fit, paragraph 6.3.5, due to four fitness assessment failures within a 24-month period. However, recommend removing FA dated 18 Jun 10, based on the fact that this was before the implementation of AFI 36-2905 (AFGM2), dated 20 Dec 10, giving Unit Commanders the authority to invalidate FAs. Although the applicant provided a memorandum from his medical provider stating that he had a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01123

    Original file (BC-2012-01123.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C, D, and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02515

    Original file (BC-2012-02515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In paragraph 6.1.6, it states if the demotion authority restores the airman's original grade following the demotion, he or she must do so between three and six months after the effective date of the demotion. Based on the available evidence, which includes statements from the applicant's current commander and first sergeant, medical records, FA history since 2004, and the demotion action file; the demotion action was procedurally correct and there is no evidence that the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02502

    Original file (BC 2013 02502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records be corrected to show that he is now and was promotion eligible during the time he was placed on a Control Roster. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOA recommends closing the case, since the applicant's record currently reflects his requested actions and they do not have the history, nor are they the OPR for control roster actions; however, based on the information provided the previous RE code 4I would have been a result of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03485

    Original file (BC 2012 03485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, because the failed FAs resulted in the applicant receiving a referral EPR and cancellation of his promotion, to the grade of technical sergeant, we recommend the referral EPR for the period of 29 Feb 2012 to 11 Jul 2012 be declared void and removed from his records and that his promotion to the grade of technical sergeant be reinstated with a date of rank and effective date of 1 Sep 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 19 Sep 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 29...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02678

    Original file (BC 2013 02678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02678 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following items on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 29 Apr 11 placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) be changed so that he can reenter the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00540

    Original file (BC-2013-00540.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00540 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) scores, dated 16 Jun 10, 23 Sep 10, 17 Dec 10, 25 Mar 11, 3 Jul 12, and 1 Oct 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant completed 36 sit-ups; however, the passing minimum score for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03222

    Original file (BC 2013 03222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a memorandum dated 28 Mar 14 from her commander expressing his support to have the 28 Aug 12 FA removed from her records. The applicant contends that her medical conditions unfairly precluded her from attaining a passing score on her 17 Dec 10, 11 Feb 11, 6 May 11, and 28 Aug 12...